infamous second son paper trail part 2 fishbein phone

#INFAMOUS SECOND SON PAPER TRAIL PART 2 FISHBEIN PHONE HOW TO#

Within and across each march, a small collection of themes remains central to the national conversation in a way that allows activists to respond to historical events. Innovative use of network analysis to detect relationships among ideas (as opposed to people, for which the method is conventionally used) reveals unexpected insights. Stopping here, however, as many analysts may be tempted to do, would lead us to mistakenly conclude that heterogeneity is ipso facto an empirical indicator of cultural incoherence and political disorganization. We show that the public forum generated by a march on Washington proposal is predictably heterogeneous-there are competing reasons why people feel such a protest event is necessary. Rather than document only the means by which activists manufacture consent or the intransigence of infighting, we provide empirical support for a thin coherence approach to the study of culture, politics, and sexualities.

#INFAMOUS SECOND SON PAPER TRAIL PART 2 FISHBEIN PHONE HOW TO#

Is culture coherent or incoherent? Do differences among activists unite or divide their mobilization efforts? To answer these questions, we use historical, content, and network analysis of public debates on how to organize four lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) marches on Washington. Sociology’s subfields of culture and social movements have developed alongside these tendencies, even while the research questions scholars ask are specific to their intellectual homes. This brings us to a general paradox of social life: how can it be at once stable and susceptible to change, protean yet perennial? The key analytic challenge is to explain the organization of differences, an approach that optimizes actors’ ability to achieve stability among inevitable flux.

Disciplinary advance, however, does not come from explaining only consensus and consent or strife and dissent. The means by which social cohesion is generated-in small groups, organizations, and the larger society-stands at the heart of the sociological imagination, both theoretically (e.g., Alexander 2006 Blau 1974 Collins 1975 Durkheim 1984 Mills 1959 Parsons 1937) and methodologically (e.g., Borgatti 1999 Dorian and Fararo 1998 Granovetter 1973 Moody and White 2003 Schaefer 2009 Shwed and Bearman 2010 White, Boorman, and Breiger 1976). Situated at the nexus of culture, social movements, sexualities, and networks, this article demonstrates how the anchoring mechanism works in the context of LGBT political organizing. These results suggest that activists do not simply organize around their similarities but, through cultural anchors, they use their commonalities to build a thinly coherent foundation that can also support their differences. Within and across marches, a small collection of ideas remains fixed in the national conversation, yet in a way that allows activists to address their internal diversity and respond to unfolding historical events. We propose one way of doing this using the mechanism of a cultural anchor. Rather than just describe consistencies or contradictions, we contend that the key analytic challenge is to explain the organization of differences. Content, historical, and network analyses of public debates on how to organize four lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) Washington marches provide evidence for an integrative position. This article moves beyond such dichotomies. Now we are done with part 2.Social scientists describe culture as either coherent or incoherent and political dissent as either unifying or divisive. Now, watch the video to get the answer to the second question, or if you don't want to do that, put in 'Judge Paulson' as the answer to the other question. This number may be different, use whatever you see. Above it, it will say: 'File retrieved, RE: Case File #82453351' Here's one of the answers to the question on Kriley's website. Use this number on the /intranet website. Notice the red text, in this red text there will be certain letters replaced by numbers, write down these numbers in the order they appear, this may be dynamic, for me it ended up being 14359595841. These 2 answers will end up completing this mission. You will see a lot of text and a place to answer 2 questions. The header at the top of the page shows a website, go there. Once done with the console section, return to where you will now have Kriley's Datebook.

Infamous second son paper trail part 2 fishbein phone